Download TV Show - Finale
For iOS, you will be prompted to install a configuration profile. This is safe and standard for adding web apps to your Home Screen.
This will add an icon for TV Show - Finale to your Home Screen. Tapping it will take you to an interactive loading page before launching the game.
If you wish to remove the profile later, go to Settings > General > VPN & Device Management, select the profile for TV Show - Finale, and tap "Remove Profile".
Screenshots
Download Information
TV Show - Finale APK is available for Android devices. Download the latest version of the APK file and install it on your Android phone or tablet. Enjoy all features and updates directly from our app store.
TV Show - Finale IPA is available for iOS devices. Download the latest IPA file and install it on your iPhone or iPad. No Jailbreak Required Our store provides safe and fast downloads for all iOS users.
Get TV Show - Finale for your device now. Whether you need the APK for Android or the IPA for iOS, we have you covered with the latest version, free and secure.
About TV Show - Finale
This is a story about an alternative world featuring dragons, unicorns, canine-like creatures called kishunimaras, demons, and deities that is presented as the first draft of a screenplay by a struggling writer in a post-modern way. Here are my thoughts and intentions for various characters within the story.
Telia - The final appearance of Telia features her attaining all of the success and power she ever wanted after the death of King Priapism, her former mentor. The cost of that power and success was that she can no longer communicate with anyone. I came up with the idea after watching a bunch of influencers and content creators on social media who can’t seem to go five minutes without pointing out how stupid they are, how powerless they are, and how depressed they are. The responses in the comment sections seem to vary from “OMG, that’s so relatable,” to long-winded essays that are supposed to be about how sympathetic the commenter is to the influencer they have a parasocial relationship with, but end up actually being a way for them to vent about their own frustrations with their life and gain validation from the community or the influencer.
I was thinking about how influencers who don’t constantly tell the world how miserable they are and present themselves as being happy and fulfilled aren’t seen as relatable, and at worst are seen as being deceitful. As Ethan from H3H3 Productions said “Those kinds of lifestyles you see people presenting online don’t exist. No one is happy, everyone is miserable. If you say you’re happy, you’re lying.”
That’s what Telia represents. When she was miserable she was relatable, when she gained power she became unrelatable and no one could understand what she was saying. Not only that, but they looked at her with suspicion, as though she must be doing something evil with her newfound power and that her happiness couldn’t be real, she must have some kind of evil plan.
King Priapism - Honestly, I had a wildly different plan for Priapism and this story in general. But, as I was writing this story I accidentally told my step-mom that I had attempted suicide almost five years ago. Her response was to call me crazy, to claim that I shouldn’t be blaming her for my attempted suicide (I wasn’t blaming her, I was blaming myself), and to send me mean TikTok videos of boomers complaining about “Soft-ass kids.”
Honestly, the fact that Priapism is Greed’s dad made me rethink the story and how I wanted it to go because it was something that was always on my mind. Throughout my entire life people told me how my step-mom was evil, weird, and only cared about herself and the image she presented to the world, and she always secretly hated me because I was a threat to that perfect public image. Greed represents my sister who knew that all along, and Dusk represents a little girl who sees her teacher as a good person who learns through an act of callousness and cruelty how evil her mentor actually is, then, she becomes evil herself, which I feel is what happened to me. I feel sick, and I feel like there’s no path to becoming ‘normal’ now, so I might as well be evil and happy, like Dusk when she decides to use her incredible power to turn her own adopted mother into her love slave. I don’t think the interpretation should be that I want to make my stepmom into a love slave like Dusk did, it’s more that I wanted to write about a young girl seducing her mother because that fictional scenario arouses me. Like Dusk at the end of the story I was like “Yeah, I don’t care if you guys think this is bad. This is the story I want to write, and this is how I want to write it, and if you don’t like it I don’t care, I’m the one with the power here.”
Skycloud - If you’ve ever wondered why so many young white males are gravitating towards people like Andrew Tate and internet personalities like Doomcock when left-wing ideologies are so much smarter and more compassionate, you only need to sit through a Munecat video and a Doomcock video, then note the differences in how they treat their audience.
Doomcock posts multiple videos and livestreams every week, while Munecat posts a single video every 3-4 months and, as far as I know, doesn’t livestream. Doomcock begins every one of his videos with a warm “Greetings, my friends,” while Munecat seems to dislike her audience to the point where she’s just as likely to insult them in her videos as she is her targets.
What I’m saying is that I think that people on the left feel like they are morally and intellectually superior to their audiences and to people that disagree with them. More-or-less, they feel like because they read an essay about a specific topic that was written by a gay African woman, that means that their position is correct in every possible way because gay African woman are obviously the smartest people on every topic (gay African men as well, judging by the Alt-Right Playbook series), and if you don’t agree with them you’re an idiot that only disagrees with them because they’re too stupid to have the correct opinion, therefore all they need to do to make you agree with them is to educate you. Basically, they act unironically like the college girls in Fritz The Cat.
The point I’m crawling towards is that validation is important and valuable. It doesn’t matter if your intentions are good or if you’re actually smarter and/or more moral, unless you provide validation when you’re trying to convince people that you are the voice of reason that deserves to be listened to. Essentially, if you’re the writer of She-Hulk and you insult Doomcock, as well as all of the online trolls, they’re going to take Doomcock’s side on the issue regardless of whether or not he’s right or wrong because he provided his audience with validation, and the She-Hulk writers made a clear statement that they refuse to provide their fans with validation because they don’t think that they deserve it.
I think that the core difference between the left and right, the woke and unwoke, is how they distribute validation. For the left it feels like they treat validation as though it’s a treat that they give to people when they’ve been good, which is why left-wing creators generally publish videos relatively infrequently, whereas right-wing, or even centrist creators, treat validation as though it’s something that can, and should, be given out as frequently as possible.
The problem is that denying validation is like denying people water and food unless they earn it. I personally believe that the reason why the left generally seem weirder than the right is because it’s easier to get validation if you lean right or are a centrist than it is to get validation on the left. So, if you choose to be on the left you’re either going to be starving for validation or drowning in validation to the point where you feel overwhelmed (which is what leads to Youtube burnout even if a creator posts infrequently), whereas if you’re on the right the consistent trickle of validation makes you not even consider the possibility of what it would feel like to have no validation at all. That’s why left-wing people seem to be either constantly seeking attention or retreating away from the possibility of gaining attention because they feel smothered by the attention they receive. It’s also why you hear right-wing people and centrists seem so apathetic towards validation, as though they take the validation they regularly receive for granted and legitimately don’t understand how important validation is, and how it contributes to their mental health.
Skycloud starts off like a lot of people in Vancouver, on the streets, addicted to drugs, and feeling like he doesn’t have a place in the world. All it took to turn his life around was a friend named Greed that accepted him, involved him in his life, and provided him the validation he needed as well as a place in the world where he belonged.
What I was trying to say with Skycloud is that, no, left-wing moralists, educating people about the homeless problem in Vancouver exists isn’t going to solve it, what will solve it is providing a pleasing alternative to being homeless. If given the option of living on the streets with access to drugs and a community that provides validation freely, or the cold one-room shelters run by left-wing people who treat you more like a pet than a person and don’t want to spend time with you unless they’re being paid, most people will choose to sleep on the street.
I think that if you see a bunch of people joining a cause or group that you don’t agree with, or think is outright evil, because they offer free candy, if your first instinct to sway people away from that cause or group isn’t to offer them free candy but to explain why people shouldn’t want free candy, you might not be educating people, helping people, or saving the world. You might just be a person who doesn’t want to share their candy.
Edit: My friend said this:
I'm still reading it but your message within Skycloud... About how the Left wings are stupid, so is the right wings. Can't be smart without the head.
Sir Phobos and Sugar - Part of the reason why groomers and MAPS are so prevalent online is a belief that it’s possible for a 15-year-old girl to be just as mature as an 18-year-old girl, and to deny that incredibly mature 15-year-old girl the opportunity to have sex with a 30-year-old man, or more often, a 20-year-old man, is irrational. My point of view on that hypothetical situation is that if you honestly believe that a 15-year-old acting as mature as an 18-year-old is actually as mature as an 18-year-old, you must not know anything about teenagers, or kids, at all, because a big part of being a teenager is thinking, and acting, more superficially mature than you actually are.
I suppose Sir Phobos and Sugar’s relationship was meant to depict a deliberately skewed view of a grooming situation where the young Disney princess spends her teenage years and early adult years grooming her f...
Telia - The final appearance of Telia features her attaining all of the success and power she ever wanted after the death of King Priapism, her former mentor. The cost of that power and success was that she can no longer communicate with anyone. I came up with the idea after watching a bunch of influencers and content creators on social media who can’t seem to go five minutes without pointing out how stupid they are, how powerless they are, and how depressed they are. The responses in the comment sections seem to vary from “OMG, that’s so relatable,” to long-winded essays that are supposed to be about how sympathetic the commenter is to the influencer they have a parasocial relationship with, but end up actually being a way for them to vent about their own frustrations with their life and gain validation from the community or the influencer.
I was thinking about how influencers who don’t constantly tell the world how miserable they are and present themselves as being happy and fulfilled aren’t seen as relatable, and at worst are seen as being deceitful. As Ethan from H3H3 Productions said “Those kinds of lifestyles you see people presenting online don’t exist. No one is happy, everyone is miserable. If you say you’re happy, you’re lying.”
That’s what Telia represents. When she was miserable she was relatable, when she gained power she became unrelatable and no one could understand what she was saying. Not only that, but they looked at her with suspicion, as though she must be doing something evil with her newfound power and that her happiness couldn’t be real, she must have some kind of evil plan.
King Priapism - Honestly, I had a wildly different plan for Priapism and this story in general. But, as I was writing this story I accidentally told my step-mom that I had attempted suicide almost five years ago. Her response was to call me crazy, to claim that I shouldn’t be blaming her for my attempted suicide (I wasn’t blaming her, I was blaming myself), and to send me mean TikTok videos of boomers complaining about “Soft-ass kids.”
Honestly, the fact that Priapism is Greed’s dad made me rethink the story and how I wanted it to go because it was something that was always on my mind. Throughout my entire life people told me how my step-mom was evil, weird, and only cared about herself and the image she presented to the world, and she always secretly hated me because I was a threat to that perfect public image. Greed represents my sister who knew that all along, and Dusk represents a little girl who sees her teacher as a good person who learns through an act of callousness and cruelty how evil her mentor actually is, then, she becomes evil herself, which I feel is what happened to me. I feel sick, and I feel like there’s no path to becoming ‘normal’ now, so I might as well be evil and happy, like Dusk when she decides to use her incredible power to turn her own adopted mother into her love slave. I don’t think the interpretation should be that I want to make my stepmom into a love slave like Dusk did, it’s more that I wanted to write about a young girl seducing her mother because that fictional scenario arouses me. Like Dusk at the end of the story I was like “Yeah, I don’t care if you guys think this is bad. This is the story I want to write, and this is how I want to write it, and if you don’t like it I don’t care, I’m the one with the power here.”
Skycloud - If you’ve ever wondered why so many young white males are gravitating towards people like Andrew Tate and internet personalities like Doomcock when left-wing ideologies are so much smarter and more compassionate, you only need to sit through a Munecat video and a Doomcock video, then note the differences in how they treat their audience.
Doomcock posts multiple videos and livestreams every week, while Munecat posts a single video every 3-4 months and, as far as I know, doesn’t livestream. Doomcock begins every one of his videos with a warm “Greetings, my friends,” while Munecat seems to dislike her audience to the point where she’s just as likely to insult them in her videos as she is her targets.
What I’m saying is that I think that people on the left feel like they are morally and intellectually superior to their audiences and to people that disagree with them. More-or-less, they feel like because they read an essay about a specific topic that was written by a gay African woman, that means that their position is correct in every possible way because gay African woman are obviously the smartest people on every topic (gay African men as well, judging by the Alt-Right Playbook series), and if you don’t agree with them you’re an idiot that only disagrees with them because they’re too stupid to have the correct opinion, therefore all they need to do to make you agree with them is to educate you. Basically, they act unironically like the college girls in Fritz The Cat.
The point I’m crawling towards is that validation is important and valuable. It doesn’t matter if your intentions are good or if you’re actually smarter and/or more moral, unless you provide validation when you’re trying to convince people that you are the voice of reason that deserves to be listened to. Essentially, if you’re the writer of She-Hulk and you insult Doomcock, as well as all of the online trolls, they’re going to take Doomcock’s side on the issue regardless of whether or not he’s right or wrong because he provided his audience with validation, and the She-Hulk writers made a clear statement that they refuse to provide their fans with validation because they don’t think that they deserve it.
I think that the core difference between the left and right, the woke and unwoke, is how they distribute validation. For the left it feels like they treat validation as though it’s a treat that they give to people when they’ve been good, which is why left-wing creators generally publish videos relatively infrequently, whereas right-wing, or even centrist creators, treat validation as though it’s something that can, and should, be given out as frequently as possible.
The problem is that denying validation is like denying people water and food unless they earn it. I personally believe that the reason why the left generally seem weirder than the right is because it’s easier to get validation if you lean right or are a centrist than it is to get validation on the left. So, if you choose to be on the left you’re either going to be starving for validation or drowning in validation to the point where you feel overwhelmed (which is what leads to Youtube burnout even if a creator posts infrequently), whereas if you’re on the right the consistent trickle of validation makes you not even consider the possibility of what it would feel like to have no validation at all. That’s why left-wing people seem to be either constantly seeking attention or retreating away from the possibility of gaining attention because they feel smothered by the attention they receive. It’s also why you hear right-wing people and centrists seem so apathetic towards validation, as though they take the validation they regularly receive for granted and legitimately don’t understand how important validation is, and how it contributes to their mental health.
Skycloud starts off like a lot of people in Vancouver, on the streets, addicted to drugs, and feeling like he doesn’t have a place in the world. All it took to turn his life around was a friend named Greed that accepted him, involved him in his life, and provided him the validation he needed as well as a place in the world where he belonged.
What I was trying to say with Skycloud is that, no, left-wing moralists, educating people about the homeless problem in Vancouver exists isn’t going to solve it, what will solve it is providing a pleasing alternative to being homeless. If given the option of living on the streets with access to drugs and a community that provides validation freely, or the cold one-room shelters run by left-wing people who treat you more like a pet than a person and don’t want to spend time with you unless they’re being paid, most people will choose to sleep on the street.
I think that if you see a bunch of people joining a cause or group that you don’t agree with, or think is outright evil, because they offer free candy, if your first instinct to sway people away from that cause or group isn’t to offer them free candy but to explain why people shouldn’t want free candy, you might not be educating people, helping people, or saving the world. You might just be a person who doesn’t want to share their candy.
Edit: My friend said this:
I'm still reading it but your message within Skycloud... About how the Left wings are stupid, so is the right wings. Can't be smart without the head.
Sir Phobos and Sugar - Part of the reason why groomers and MAPS are so prevalent online is a belief that it’s possible for a 15-year-old girl to be just as mature as an 18-year-old girl, and to deny that incredibly mature 15-year-old girl the opportunity to have sex with a 30-year-old man, or more often, a 20-year-old man, is irrational. My point of view on that hypothetical situation is that if you honestly believe that a 15-year-old acting as mature as an 18-year-old is actually as mature as an 18-year-old, you must not know anything about teenagers, or kids, at all, because a big part of being a teenager is thinking, and acting, more superficially mature than you actually are.
I suppose Sir Phobos and Sugar’s relationship was meant to depict a deliberately skewed view of a grooming situation where the young Disney princess spends her teenage years and early adult years grooming her f...
Information
Seller
Weird420XL
Version
1.0.1
Released
Oct 24, 2022
